Content Needed?
I was looking at examples of source types guides and came across this. I liked the way they broke down types of periodicals: Distinguishing Scholarly from Non-Scholarly Periodicals: A Checklist of Criteria - Cornell libraries, CC BY-NC-SA (MPA)
Maybe short lateral reading video? I can do that or find one. (MPA)
Both popular and scholarly sources can be either credible or biased. The Internet has broadened the spectrum of and access to lots of different information in many formats.
There are plenty of examples of information sources that are credible, yet still not appropriate to use in college-level work. When it comes to sources that you want to cite in your paper or essay, you'll want to seek out sources that are credible and also scholarly.
Since anyone can publish information online, it’s important to know whether or not a source is authoritative. To be an authority on a subject, an author must be accepted as an expert by professionals in his or her field.
For example, an article in an academic journal is likely to be more authoritative than a personal blog post.
You can determine the authority of a source by researching the author’s
For sources found online, this type of information is displayed on the About Us page.
Accurate sources rely on the objective interpretation of evidence. Scientific reports, for example, often include a methodology section that describes the research process to validate the author’s conclusions. These types of sources typically are peer reviewed, meaning their content has been reviewed by experts on the topic.
Investigating a source’s references will help you assess its accuracy. Ask yourself:
The date that an article or any other source was published can be crucial to your research. If your topic is tied to subjects that change very quickly, such as law, medicine, science, or technology, a recent date is important.
Currency is determined by the date the source was created. Depending on your subject, a source’s currency may determine its usefulness. In the science and technology disciplines especially, advances are made at a rapid pace, which means past results quickly become dated or discredited. But new isn’t always better. Sometimes older sources may be required to better understand current advances on a given subject.
The value of a source depends on its relevance to your research question. First consider how much the resource covers.
Closely analyzing what a resource does or doesn’t discuss will help you choose sources that align with your research need.
Objectivity relates to a resource’s purpose and point of view. When a source is objective, it means the creator uses evidence rather than personal opinion to reach logical conclusions. Biased sources, on the other hand, may present evidence in a way that supports predetermined conclusions. Other sources even may intentionally distort the facts to poke fun at a person or event.
Even experts can have an agenda for producing articles and books, so you need to figure out the purpose for the material.
When you encounter new information or a new resource, stop and take your bearings. Ask yourself: Do I know and trust this website? If not, use the other moves to learn more about it before you read or share.
You also want to stop periodically while you work through the moves to make sure you haven't gone down a rabbit hole. Remember, these strategies are meant to be fairly quick. If it's taking you a long time, check your strategy and make sure it's working.
Find information about the source from other sources. Ask questions like:
Investigating a source can help you contextualize the information and uncover hidden biases. You want to know if the economics article you're reading was written by a Nobel laureate economist. You also want to know if the video you're watching about the health benefits of milk was put out by the dairy industry. It isn't because the Nobel prize winner is always right about everything or because you can never trust the dairy industry, but knowing that context impacts how you are going to approach the information.
Sometimes the article or video you found doesn't matter as much as the claim it's making. In that case, choose some keywords to search. If it's a current event, try using the news filter on your search engine.
Knowing whether a claim is widely accepted or still hotly debated provides more context for you to use as you evaluate it.
Track the facts or data back to the original source to make sure they weren't taken out of context. Some things to consider:
The context in which something happened or information was created influences its meaning, but many things online are taken out of context for a variety of reasons. Understanding that original context will help you evaluate your information effectively.
When you investigate a source, you don't want to rely only on what the creators tell you about themselves. You want to know what other sources say about them before you continue. Professional fact-checkers use a simple strategy called lateral reading to quickly and accurately determine the reliability of a source in just a few steps:
Doing this helps you determine who is really behind the information you've found, which is key to evaluating and analyzing it.
New introduction video? Or some other content to contextualize bias